Saturday, May 30, 2026

Step 3, Item 1 - The Women

Doubting Doubt

(Table of Contents - Click This Link)

The Process

Step 3 – He is Beside Himself

 

1.  The Women

 

  During an adult Sunday School lesson on the Gospel of Mark, we were focusing on the section from chapter 15 verse 40 through chapter 16 verse 8, which talks about the presence of the women who were present during Jesus’ crucifixion and who went to the tomb after the Sabbath.  The Bible Study teacher for the day, a woman with a distinguished Bible teaching background, described the women as “unflinching,” and having “steadfast loyalty.”  She said, “These women really were devoted to Jesus.”  Some of the other words describing those women that came up in the course of the class were “love,” “faith,” “commitment” and “courage.”

  Pastor Charles Glidewell, author of the lesson in the Bible Study Guide that we were using, described the women whom we are told were “watching from a distance” in Mark 15:40:

  These seemingly peripheral women were not so peripheral here at the end.  They stood at a distance as their Savior died, and their faith did not falter.  As heart wrenching as it was, the women looked on and did not abandon their Lord.

  After Jesus took his last breath, the ordeal was not over.  A number of matters still had to be handled.  Although the spectacle of the crucifixion was over, it seems the women could not tear themselves away from the scene.[1]


  Glidewell later goes on to say,

  We must not forget the women who were faithfully present at Jesus’ crucifixion, burial and resurrection.

 

  He continues further on, saying,

  Does your faith reflect the unassuming and steady faithfulness of these women?

 

  The point could scarcely be stressed more strongly.  These women’s faith, loyalty, devotion and steadfastness are the defining features of their characters.  I must certainly say that I share that perception about them.

  However, not attempting to be incredulous and cynical myself, I must recognize that it is conceivable that a different case could be attempted by someone who is incredulous and cynical.  A passage such as the following, from the book The Jewish People in the First Century, might be used to press just such a case:

  In addition to preparation of shrouds and a coffin, burial arrangements included the acquisition of keeners and pipers.  A halakhah informs us that, as a minimum, a husband was expected to provide one keening woman and two pipers for his wife’s funeral, and this was required even of the poorest Jew.[2]

 

  Incidentally, does the reference to this practice pertain only in the case of a husband for his wife?  I have not been able to verify that.  However, when considered in combination with other descriptions elsewhere in the book of customary behaviors by first century Jews during mourning periods, it appears that similar practices occurred whoever the deceased was.

  Regarding the entourage described, the book goes on to say,

  Keening women probably received wages for their work.  In most towns if not in all there existed charitable societies whose purpose was to care for the dead and aid the mourners thus doing works of righteousness for both; a sage of the Jabneh period referred to such groups in Jerusalem.  These charitable groups also took care of the preparation of the corpse for burial:  there was a fixed tradition regulating the preparation of the corpses, and certainly not everyone knew how to care for the corpse and perform such required functions as bathing it and wrapping it in shrouds.[3]

 

  With statements such as these it would be expected that the incredulous and cynical person would attempt to make the case that the women who attended to Jesus were not faithful and devoted and steadfast at all, but rather they were simply paid caregivers or perhaps people who were the first century equivalents of hospice workers.

  I do not think that such a case would be successful, however, for two reasons:

  (1) It would have to be established that at least some if not all of the women spoken of in the Bible accounts of the death and burial of Jesus were strictly involved occupationally.  Considering that in the first place the Bible does not say that they were working for wages and secondly that some of them are referenced at other times in the life of Jesus, it is doubtful that such a claim could be successfully established.

  (2) It is necessary to remember not only what the information in the Gospels is but also its intent.  There is a very high degree of probability that persons mentioned anywhere in the Bible are included deliberately for a purpose and not simply as collateral artifacts as one might see “extras” in a movie.  So then it is also possible that the women spoken of in these accounts are included for a purposeful reason and, simultaneously, there could have been assistance from the charitable groups.

  The incredulous cynical person may then attempt a different tactic.  Again, from the book The Jewish People in the First Century we read this:

  Our literature stresses the fact that it was customary to assign someone to attend the corpse continuously …[4]  … The beginning of the eighth chapter of Semahoth states:  ‘One should go to the cemetery to check the dead within three days and not fear that such smacks of pagan practices; it once happened that a [buried] man was visited and went on to live another twenty-five years.’  This baraita shows that it was customary to go and verify that the buried person was really dead, for as burial followed death so quickly, errors might sometimes occur.  The baraita bolsters its ruling with the story of a man who was in fact discovered to be alive after his burial, which we should understand in view of the fact that graves were not filled with dirt, but only blocked with movable boulders.  The women who came to visit Jesus’ grave were following the Jewish custom of rolling back the entrance boulder in order to make sure that he was really dead.  It is not impossible that the practices became customary even when the fact of death was known with complete certainty, although, as our baraita testifies, the practice of visiting graves within the first three days after burial originated in the need to allay all doubt that there had not been only apparent death, and that the buried person in the meantime had not returned to life.[5]

 

  ‘Baraita’ is a word for a class of Jewish instruction or traditional teaching.  The person who is skeptical that the women were truly devoted and faithful might attempt to say that the women were only doing what they were told to do, that they did it out of obligation.  They were assigned to tend to the corpse.  They went to the tomb in a prescribed manner and they went there to make prudent verification of death.

  Again, that scenario would probably be impossible to establish for many reasons.  Consider Matthew 28:8-9 –

  8 So they departed quickly from the tomb with fear and great joy, and ran to tell his disciples.  9 And behold, Jesus met them and said, “Greetings!”  And they came up and took hold of his feet and worshiped him. (ESV)

 

  This is describing women who have a far greater interest in Jesus than women who were detached attendants, whether paid or unpaid.  Consider too the objective of these women at the time.  They were en route to the disciples.  The disciples were in hiding and the women were part of their conspicuous group.  If these women were just disinterested attendants they would have just gone back to their families and said, “It’s been a strange day on the job.”

  It has been necessary to show that it could be perfectly possible for someone to pose some fairly plausible objections to the claim about the faithfulness of the women mentioned in the Bible who were present at Jesus’ death and burial.  What we have done is that we have answered those objections by establishing rather indisputably that the women were indeed faithful beyond fear, unflinchingly devoted and maintained steadfast loyalty right to the end.  And we established this without any subjectivity.  We got the material from the Bible itself and reinforced it with other historically reliable data.  We have not had to resort to ungrounded suppositions.

  So what?

  Having established rather secure grounds for confidence in the steadfast faithfulness of the women, we can use that as a gauge later while for the time being we move on to the next step.  That step will be to see whether or not John the Baptist’s behavior in prison can be rationalized by comparing it to the behavior of Jesus’ mother in Mark 3, as Pastor X attempted to do.


[1] Charles Glidewell, The Gospel of Mark:  People Responding to Jesus – BaptistWay Adult Bible Study Guide, Lesson 13 – ‘Women at the Cross and the Tomb:  Serving Jesus to the End (U.S., BaptistWay Press, 2012), pp. 119-126

[2] S. Safrai, M. Stern, The Jewish People in the First Century:  Historical Geography, Political History, Social, Cultural and Religious Life and Institutions, series Compendia Rerum Iudaicarum ad Novum Testamentum, (pub. Assen, NL, Royal Van Gorcum 1974, Minneapolis, MN, U.S, Fortress Press 1975), pp. 774-775.

[3] Ibid, p. 775

[4] Ibid, p. 774

[5] Ibid, pp. 784-785


No comments:

Post a Comment

Update

Doubting Doubt (Table of Contents - Click This Link) Update